| |
 |
 |
| Volume 2, Issue 6 |
April 2005 |
 |
|
About Per Mar
Contact Us
CORPORATE OFFICE Per Mar
Security Services Per Mar Centre 1910 East Kimberly
Rd Davenport, IA 52807 Tel# 1-800-4-PERMAR (737627) Fax #
563-359-6700
|
|
|
| Per
Mar Security Services Announces Annual Awards |
|
Per Mar Security Services' president Bill Jackson
presented the following awards at the company's Annual General
Managers Meeting held in Davenport (IA) on February 15th, 2005:
Dale Steffes, Madison - Physical Security General
Manager of the Year Dale Steffes grew his business
significantly in 2004 and, even more importantly, he has built one
of the best teams in the business.
Tony Kovach, Eau
Claire - Electronic Security General Manager of the Year
In 2004, Tony Kovach led his business units to new heights. Tony
has worked endlessly to support all of the people on his teams.
Mike Schneider, Vice President, Electronic Security,
Division General Manager of the Year Mike was named
Division General Manager of the Year after he led his business unit
to new levels in 2004.
President's Award - Dick
Niemi, Project Manager, Wausau Dick Niemi helped
develop the Physical Security branch in Wausau and has built it into
a superior operation.
President's Award - Ron
Suokko, Business Development Manager, Racine Ron Suokko
has distinguished himself as a salesperson since joining our company
several years ago. What really sets him apart is his willingness to
take on other duties for the good of his team.
President's Award - LeeAnn Martin, Administrative
Assistant, Des Moines LeeAnn Martin has consistently
displayed the core values of our company. She is universally
respected by her coworkers and appreciated by our customers. We are
proud to have her on the Per Mar team.
President's
Award - Mark Beda, Sales Consultant, Wausau Mark Beda
is a long-time member of the Wausau team who does a great job of
establishing and maintaining strong customer relationships and in
the process creating, long time, and loyal customers.
President's Award - Doug Richard, Service Sales,
Midwest Alarm Services Since he arrived at our company
in 2002, he has helped our Midwest Alarm Services unit to soar to
new heights by building long-term customer relationships.
Ted Ewing, Vice President, Business Development, Per
Mar Centre Ted was presented a President's Award for
his business development efforts that included several large new
contracts.
Tom Wells, Manager, Electronic Security,
Per Mar Centre Tom was given a President's Award for
his work in implementing a new remote video monitoring service, as
well as his support of Per Mar's branches.
Jennifer
Lohman, Director, Human Resources, Per Mar Centre
Jennifer was presented a President's Award for her instrumental
role in developing and implementing Per Mar's Leadership Development
program.
Leadership In Action Award - Dustin Smyth,
President, Midwest Alarm Services Per Mar's first
Leadership in Action Award was presented to Dustin Smyth, someone
who has clearly provided outstanding leadership to all with whom he
works. His leadership is evidenced by the satisfaction of his team
members and the excellent results of his business overall.
top |
|
| Air
Ambulances: $afety at your Expense? |
|
2005 had a painful start for Emergency Medical
Helicopters, with four deadly crashes in less than 3 months.
Following this news came another slap in the face for the industry
when federal regulators released the results of their investigation;
findings indicate that air ambulances may not provide such a
valuable service after all. In fact, studies show that flights often
transport minimally injured patients when ground transport could
most likely get them to a hospital faster and with less risk to
others.
The air ambulance industry began taking off in the
1970's following the circulation of images of helicopters evacuating
wounded soldiers in Vietnam, and has seen steady growth since. Since
1997, the industry has doubled, and industry insiders expect to see
a consistent 5% increase in helicopter transports per year. There is
no doubt that air transport has its place: a 2002 study showed that
24% of seriously injured patients that were transported survived
because they were flown, not driven, to the hospital.
The
problem is that not all patients are seriously injured. For example,
in January 2005 the decision was made to fly a patient from Rawlins,
Wyoming, to a larger trauma center in Casper, Wyoming, 120 miles
away. No one doubts that Casper's facility is better equipped to
handle trauma, but serious doubts were raised regarding the
necessity of air transport after the patient was released after 4
days and no surgery. The real kicker: the patient's first flight
crashed, killing three crew members, and the patient had to wait
another day to be flown to Casper. All told, there had been plenty
of time in which to drive the patient had it not been for the tragic
accident. A second example involves a 9-year-old boy transported by
helicopter after breaking his jaw. Well enough to sit up and remark
on the scenery, the boy waited 20 hours once he arrived at the
hospital to undergo surgery. What was intended to save time cost the
family $25,000 in helicopter transport not covered by the family's
insurance.
So what will happen? The evidence shows that too
many patients are being flown and the trend will likely continue.
With malpractice and negligence claims on the rise, health care
professionals may feel the need to err to the side of caution, even
at the risk of incurring high costs to the patient and endangering
crew. Particularly in cities, ground transportation has a much
better chance of reaching patients and hospitals before helicopters,
simply because there are few places to land.
top |
|
|
Fraud Fact: A recent survey conducted
by the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners reveals that of all
frauds reported 82% of perpetrators are first time offenders; 47%
are women; 31% of the crimes are never reported to law enforcement;
and 26% of victim organizations never take legal action for fear of
publicity. The report also estimated that 9% of all fraudsters have
college degrees. (Source: ACFE)
|
|
| When
Horseplay is not in Fun |
|
Joking around with coworkers is often what keeps
employees sane, but the line between horseplay and harassment can be
a fine one. The dictionary defines horseplay as "rough or rowdy
play," but what does that mean inside a workplace? A definition
created by arbitrators defines it as "conduct which is done with
knowledge, or reckless disregard, of probable consequences or
injuries or done with evil intent, bad motive, or maliciousness,"
obviously a definition that carries a significantly more maleficent
meaning, but still not entirely clear.
What can clarify
horseplay is its increasing presence in the courtroom, where
horseplay has been used successfully as a defense. Several cases can
be noted in which individuals were unaware of the trickery that was
about to befall them and reacted unprofessionally and in a manner
perceived as violent, though not entirely surprising or
inappropriate given the circumstances. In such cases, once the
reaction was put in context, the discipline was often reversed or
decreased, and the perpetrator of the prank was subject to equal or
similar discipline.
When is horseplay actually bullying or
violence? Though bullying can be considered as nebulous a phrase as
horseplay, the court has upheld several different instances in which
behavior was considered bullying. Among them, an instance in which
employees brought religious items to the workplace, including
handwritten notes directed at specific coworkers, and another
instance in which ethnic slurs between coworkers were exchanged. The
court has also found that while a single incident may not constitute
bullying, repeated incidents, especially involving multiple
coworkers, does.
Best advice: Establish sound policies
regarding workplace horseplay, harassment and religiosity.
Communicate those policies and hold supervisors responsible for
enforcing them.
top |
|
| Prepaid Phones Getting a Bad Reputation |
|
Speaking of...cell phones for
kids, the Firefly by SunCom is a new phone constructed with kids in
mind. Small, simple and sturdy, this phone is meant for kids but
controlled by mom and dad, who are responsible for programming in
the 20-capacity, PIN-protected numbers.
The phone also has speed dial keys on the face
for mom, dad, and emergency calls, with accidental call prevention.
Geared toward the 8-12 year old crowd, the Firefly comes with-what
else? Prepaid service.
top |
|
| Big
Brother is Watching. Who Cares? |
|
Before the Washington D.C. Metropolitan Area
Transit Authority moves forward with its plan to add 125 cameras to
its buses (at the cost of $8,000 per bus), it might want to hear
what the Brits have to say about how well the cameras work. Since
the 1990's, London has spent almost $325 million installing 4.2
million cameras to observe London's streets, shopping centers, and
rail stations in an effort to deter crime. And for their investment,
they got…nothing. Londoners claim to feel no safer than they did
before because the cameras have not shown to be a deterrent to
crime. With the exception of the cameras in public parking lots,
support for the cameras has waned to almost nothing, and the
government has admitted that it will spend no more on the project.
In theory, the cameras sound like a good idea; however, an
expert involved in the project admits that for the cameras to be
successful in deterring crime, human intervention must take place.
In Washington D.C. this seems to already be common knowledge, as
police officers have been riding the buses to identify
perpetrators-and have been making arrests. It is not yet known if
the officers will continue to ride the buses, keeping drivers and
passengers safe, but taking the officers off the bus to replace them
with cameras is unlikely to be as effective.
top |
|
|
Quote of the Month: "Nothing is so
contagious as example, and our every really good or bad action
inspires a similar one." Francois Duc de la Rochefoucald
|
|
| Notification System in Schools Gaining
Popularity |
|
Over 1000 parents were instantly notified of a
school evacuation following the detonation of a homemade bomb in a
high school locker in February, thanks to a new emergency
telecommunications system that sent automatic voice messages. The
system called parents who had participated with the school's
service, providing telephone numbers where they could be reached. To
find out if schools in your community use the service go to the
school's website and look for ECC-Emergency Closing Center™ . ECC will allow you to search for your school, but
also provides updates on its site showing all school closings that
have been reported. The site also allows users to be notified via
e-mail.
top |
|
| E-mail Snooping in Your Office |
|
Your e-mail address may have your name on it, but
that does not protect it from the peering eyes of your employer;
even if you are the CEO. Such was the lesson learned recently by
Harry Stonecipher, the popular Chief Exec at Boeing, who got the
boot after an affair with a co-worker was uncovered when several
very private e-mails he had written were leaked to company
officials. But for all the hoopla over Stonecipher's indiscretion,
the monitoring of office e-mail is nothing new. "As an employee, you
have no rights whatsoever," when it comes to e-mail on either
company equipment or through a company account, says a prominent
Denver employment lawyer. In fact, most employees do not even have
the right to know if they are being monitored, unless they work in
Delaware or New Jersey. Though most monitoring is intended to seek
out company information that may be leaking from the organization,
internal e-mail is also subject to scrutiny. Management consultants
agree that internal communication is more likely to contain
inappropriate content or language than external communication,
simply because employees "play it fast and loose" with internal
email.
So how does it work? Though some organizations hire
staff-really-to read individual outgoing messages, other
organizations are taking the high-tech road and utilize increasingly
sophisticated electronic systems to monitor e-mail. As would be
expected, an entire industry has been born. Amazingly enough, one of
the pioneers is MessageGate, which was started by Boeing, and spun
off as a stand-alone company in 2003. The best advice: Don't use
your employer's e-mail for personal business, and do not ever put
something in an e-mail that might embarrass you should it be read by
someone other than the intended recipient.
top |
|
| The
New Extortionist |
|
Once the realm of teenagers looking to see if they
could tap into a "secure" system, the face of cyber extortion has
grown up and gotten serious. Hackers are no longer breaking into
business websites, databases, and other systems to spread nasty
viruses or just be nasty. These new criminals have learned that
threatening an organization's electronic soul can be extremely
lucrative with little risk or cost.
The extortionists use
various methods. One of the most common methods is simply send out
mass emails to companies demanding money to prevent an attack on
their system, a scheme commonly known as "phishing." Though most
companies do not fall for the scam, just receiving payment from a
few provides a sound return on investment for the extortionist. More
sophisticated scammers use "botnets" to attack systems. Bots are
programs that typically perform routine or repetitive functions
saving time and money. Bots can also be crafted to do harmful
things. Secretly loaded onto unprotected computers, extortionist can
quickly link thousands of infected computers together, forming a
botnet. Upon command, the extortionist can remotely launch his
attack if the target organization fails to pay him. Phishing scams
typically involve demands of under $5,000, but botnet demand can
exceed $50,000.
So who are they targeting? You might think
that the cyber extortionist would go after the biggest company for
the biggest payoff, but in fact, the opposite is true. Experience
shows that the larger and more sophisticated the organization, the
less likely that these scammers will get anything, let alone
millions. Instead, these criminals prefer-those with fewer resources
but with so much more to lose. For the best protection, here's what
our experts suggest:
- Back up systems regularly and test them periodically;
- Update system security and programs regularly;
- Hire competent information system security consultants;
- Enforce strict policies on security updates and passwords for
employees;
- Inform employees to come to management should they suspect a
system fail or compromise;
- Educate employees to not give information regarding the
organization, passwords, or login instructions to unknown
individuals even those claiming to be computer consultants; and
- Call law enforcement if you or your company becomes a victim
of online extortion or other cyber crimes.
top |
|
|
| Copyright © 2003-2005 PerMar Security - All
rights reserved. |
Duplication and distribution for commercial
purposes is strictly prohibited. Powered by SecurityNewsletters.comTM
| |
|